Robotic left S9-10 lung segmentectomy: how I do it?
Review Article

Robotic left S9-10 lung segmentectomy: how I do it?

Ilies Bouabdallah

Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France

Correspondence to: Ilies Bouabdallah. Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. Email: ilies.bouabdallah@gmail.com.

Abstract: Left S9-10 segmentectomy is one of the most difficult lung segmentectomies because of the highly variable peripheral pulmonary anatomies and the difficulty of dividing the intersegmental plane. The robotic system is helpful to perform through a full thoracoscopic approach this challenging procedure. We describe the technique of robotic left S9-10 lung segmentectomy.

Keywords: Lung segmentectomy; thoracic surgery; robotic surgery; lung cancer


Received: 20 January 2020; Accepted: 06 March 2020; Published: 05 October 2020.

doi: 10.21037/jovs.2020.03.03


Video 1 Robotic left S9-10 lung segmentectomy step by step.

Introduction

Lung segmentectomy is an intervention more and more practiced by thoracic surgeons in the area of lung parenchyma preservation. Indeed, there are several indications for this kind of procedure:

❖ For benign diseases or metastases with a localization not favorable for a wedge resection.

❖ For primary lung cancer, thoracic surgeons may offer to their patients a segmentectomy with radical lymph nodes dissection in two different situations:

⬥ Patients with good respiratory function and a small lesion (cT1a-bN0M0): a segmentectomy may be an option, instead of a lobectomy, if tumor’s localization is anatomically favorable with safe margins and also if frozen section examination of N1 lymph nodes is negative. We call it an intentional segmentectomy.

⬥ Patients with limit respiratory function and a small lesion (cT1a-bN0M0): a segmentectomy may be an option for local treatment because these patients cannot benefit of a lobectomy. We call it a compromised segmentectomy.

The left S9-10 segmentectomy is a very technical intervention that can be challenging mainly because of anatomical variations and the difficulty of the intersegmental plan (1).


Operative technic

Ports placement

Depending on the surgeon, there is a wide variety of port positioning. The authors have chosen for all kind of lung resection a technique similar to that described by Dr. Robert Cerfolio (2). It is a total port approach with 4 ports in the 8th intercostal space and a last one (the most anterior) in the 6th space. The advantage of this complete port access is to group 4 of the 5 ports in a single intercostal space in order to reduce the parietal trauma. Firstly, it needs to identify the 8th space, then to place the ports along this space with, from back to front:

❖ A first port of 5 mm (8 mm on the Xi) about 4 cm (5 cm on the Xi) from the spine for the arm which will serve as an exposure using a soft grip forceps (Thoracic Grasper on the Si, Fenestrated Grasper or Tip Up Grasper on the Xi).

❖ A second port about 9 cm from the previous one (8 cm on the Xi). The authors use by this port an instrument for dissection with bipolar energy (Maryland Bipolar).

❖ A third port about 9 cm from the previous one (8 cm on the Xi) to receive the camera arm (12 mm trocar on the Si, 8 mm trocar on the Xi).

❖ A fourth port about 9 cm from the previous one (8 cm on the Xi). It is the 12 mm assistant port allowing help to carry out aspiration, exposure, stapling… After completing the segmental resection, the operative specimen will be placed in an Endobag before being extracted through this port that will be enlarged.

❖ The fifth and last port is located in the 6th intercostal space, in the most anterior position possible so as to make a triangulation between the latter, the assistant port and the camera. This triangulation is important in order to preserve sufficient working space for the assistant. This port will receive arm 4 with a gripping instrument (Caudiere). Finally, it is through this orifice that the chest tube will be introduced at the end of surgery.

Initial inspection

The first step is to assess the entire thoracic cavity, the quality of the parenchyma (emphysema), the fissures opening (Walker’s classification), the anatomical disposition and the exact tumor’s localization. Authors used to always have cigar sponges (rolls gauze) available in the chest for lung mobilization or compression in case of bleeding.

Radical lymph node dissection

Authors are used to remove the lymph nodes at the beginning of the intervention. It allows to clear the bronchovascular elements and makes easier the lung resection. The lymph node dissection is performed all around the hilum (station 10L), in mediastinal sites (station 8L&9L, station 7, station 5&6) and inside the fissure (station 11L and station 12L). All lymph nodes located at the arterial division of A8 and A9-10 must be sent for frozen section examination in case of intentional segmentectomy.

Artery dissection

The pulmonary artery is approached in the middle portion of the major fissure as for a lower lobectomy. After Identification of the pulmonary artery in the fissure, its branches are dissected and A6, A8 and A9-10 are identified. Stapling the last exposes the segmental bronchus with runs posteriorly (Video 1).

Bronchus dissection

The most frequent anatomy of the basilar segment is B8 and B9-10 and A8 and A9-10 explaining this bi-segmentectomy. Dissecting the B9-10 branches, care has been taken to not hurt B6 or the vein running behind it. It’s helpful to use a vessel loop around A8 for exposure by retracting it forward. Bronchus is then stapled after a reventilation test.

Venous dissection

The inferior pulmonary vein is cleared from the surrounding tissues, until the superior and inferior basal veins and also V6 are identified. The lower root of the inferior pulmonary vein is the inferior basal vein and does not always represent the venous drainage of S9 and S10. One of its branches can drain S8 or it could have no separate basal veins but a common basal vein and V6.

Thus, there are 2 options to control veins:

❖ Proximally with identification of inferior basal vein if anatomical pattern is modal. In case of doubt, it can be safer to divide only the lowermost tributary.

❖ Distally with identification of the vein in the parenchyma under the bronchus.

Intersegmental plane

There are also 2 options for this moment: with or without S6 split. At the beginning of the learning curve, we took the intersegmental plane at the end of the procedure without splitting S6. We stapled from the diaphragmatic side of S9-10 and skewing the staple line to the rear when reaching the inferior border of S6. We found this maneuver unsatisfactory to stay bronchovascular stumps remote on the specimen and now we apply a tunneling technique to separate S6 and S9-10 (3). In this technic with S6 split, bronchovascular stapling is performed after opening the intersegmental plane between S6 and S9-10, thus facilitating the exposure of the bronchovascular elements. This technic needs to start by clearing the inferior pulmonary vein from the surrounding tissues. A passage is created between V6 and the superior basal vein, using a blunt dissection to avoid hurting V6. The surgeons move then back to the fissure (where the bronchovascular elements have previously been dissected but not stapled) and find the tip of the blunt instrument coming from the back. After the easier stapling of the bronchovascular elements, the intersegmental plane between S8 and S9-10 is taken from the diaphragmatic side and stapling should be done step by step progressing in a cephalad direction to the first staple line between S6 and S9-10.


Discussion

Compared to VATS where the instrumentation remains limited, the robotic system offers large possibilities for dissection. First, eye-hand coordination is no longer reversed as in VATS. In addition, the system removes the physiological tremor known in VATS and even increases the surgeon’s gestures with a scale of 3:1 or 5:1. This results in an excellent level of precision necessary for this kind of challenging cases. Indeed, the main difficulties of minimally invasive segmentectomies lie in locating the very small target lesion, in identifying precisely the intersegmental plane and in performing an intra-parenchymal radical lymph node dissection for stations 12&13. However robotic system has some advantages that can help surgeons for all these points.

Regarding the lesion’s identification, surgeons can use bronchoscopic dye injection like indocyanine green (ICG) inside le target just before the intervention. When introducing the camera at the beginning of the surgery, the operator can identify the lesion with a near-infrared imaging system (Firefly technology). It also possible to use intrabronchial injection of methylene blue but identification is less accurate. Another option is to place a radiological coil close to the lesion just before the intervention. It needs an interventional radiologist available and a good logistic to synchronize both procedures. In all cases a precise localization of the lesion is mandatory to ensure correct safety margins.

Fluorescence is also essential for intersegmental plane (4). Clamping A9-10 and using a systemic injection of ICG at the dose of 0.2 mg/kg allows to identify S9-10. Indeed, areas that did not take the green color corresponded to segments to resect. This is also helpful to ensure the respect of the vascularization of the remaining segments after removing the specimen. Without fluorescence the intersegmental plane can be identified during the reventilation test, but this is less precise mainly for patients with emphysema.

To ensure good oncological outcomes, lymph node dissection of remaining segments must be done (5,6). The dexterity offered by the robot allows fine dissection even for very small lymph nodes. Note that the procedure must be converted to a lobectomy in case of invaded lymph node sent for the frozen section examination (for an intentional segmentectomy) or if insufficient safety margins.

Finally, because of several anatomical variations, 3D reconstruction is strongly recommended to avoid misunderstandings of pulmonary structures. Without reconstruction, dissection has to be pursued as low as possible to identify all the branches before stapling. Regarding the arterial branches, a low A6 can be mistaken for an A9-10. More, instead of A8 and A9-10, the branching pattern with A8-9 and A10 or A8, A9 and A10 can be encountered (7). The same variation is possible for bronchi. 3D reconstruction allows for a dynamic navigation in the arteries, veins and bronchi, and calculates the volume of the segments to be resected and a safety margin can be visualized.


Conclusions

Left S9-10 segmentectomy is a very challenging intervention. Knowing anatomical landmarks is mandatory to ensure a safe resection. Quality metrics are essential, and the robotic platform is an undeniable help to perform this procedure with good oncological outcomes.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the Guest Editor (Jean-Marc Baste) for the series “Advancement in Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery” published in Journal of Visualized Surgery. This article has undergone external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2020.03.03). The series “Advancement in Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office without any sponsorship or funding. The author has no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The author is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Igai H, Kamiyoshihara M, Kawatani N, et al. Thoracoscopic lateral and posterior basal (S9 + 10) segmentectomy using intersegmental tunnelling. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:790-1. [PubMed]
  2. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, et al. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:740-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Yamanashi K, Okumura N, Otsuki Y, et al. Stapler-Based Thoracoscopic Basilar Segmentectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:e399-e402. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Guigard S, Triponez F, Bédat B, et al. Usefulness of near-infrared angiography for identifying the intersegmental plane and vascular supply during video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017;25:703-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Thomas PA. Intraoperative lymph-node assessment during NSCLC surgery: the need for standardisation and quality evaluation. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:23-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Thomas PA. Lymph node dissection during sublobar resection: why, when and how? J Thorac Dis 2018;10:S1145-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Nomori H, Okada M. Illustrated Anatomical Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer [Internet]. Springer Japan; 2012 [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available online: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9784431541431
doi: 10.21037/jovs.2020.03.03
Cite this article as: Bouabdallah I. Robotic left S9-10 lung segmentectomy: how I do it? J Vis Surg 2020;6:44.